CWC-II Army List Errata/Suggestions (Open)

[Raider4]

Slightly less armour and faster

Yes, but given the granularity of the CWC system, would the in-game stats be any different?

If you up the speed to 25, that's the same as the Challengers. Really?

I can see more of an argument for dropping the armour to 5, so it would match with M48/M60. I think the later Centurions maybe over-armoured with 6.

[Lord Kermit of Birkenhead]

I'll see if I can find my stats

[Lord Kermit of Birkenhead]

Took a hunt but I made it :- 5/120   5/100   3   5   4 Speed is 25 and it has IRNF.

[PrivatePikeDa]

That one's on the revision list, the new stats will be:

T-10M    155    AFV    15    6/60    6/60    6    3    -/- [9]

Brilliant, Thanks

[dylan]

Err, isn't the T-10 still 6 hits saving on a 3?  Seems a bit generous.

[Jordi]

A Type 56 should in effect be the same at RPG-2 (in game terms).

Both should be the same points (15pts) and both should have the same stats (AP: 3/10 |AT:3/10H)

I'll do a check across all the appropriate lists and adjust (45pts is a typo) 

Thanks
Mark

The statsof Rpg-2 are correct for all the lists including NVA and Vietcong

[Jordi]

Sorry the uppers post war a question.

[Big Insect]

Sorry the uppers post war a question.

Ahead of the launch of 'continuity' errata update, I am not publishing any of the revised stats on a 1-off basis.

However, as a general rule, if you think that a stat is incorrect, the best approach is to go back to the same weapon stats in the on-line army list for the manufacturing country (Soviet Union, UK, USA, France, China etc.) and use that as a default.
I am currently stuck in-bed with flu - so this is fullest extent of my answer on the matter - at present   
(cough cough cough)
Mark

[Jordi]

Ok. Story.
Thanks.