Hearts of Oak (well MDF...)

Started by Last Hussar, 09 January 2019, 08:57:05 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Last Hussar

Finished the "command" stands for VI corps. They are no different in the rules, it's just that they have colours on.

That's 2, 4 and 6 Corps done. Next, Cavalry.

Question; what colour trousers?

I was going to go with all green uniforms,  but then found on Obscure Battles that's only the dragoons; hussars and uhlans are red or blue. Did they keep the green trousers?

Also, does anyone have a site with the horse blankets on?
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Ithoriel

This might give some info if you can be bothered to plough through it!

https://marksrussianmilitaryhistory.info/V11/V11.htm#c
There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data

Last Hussar

Cheers, that is... detailed!

"Dmitry,  we haven't changed the uniform in 4 months, change all the braiding..."

Using that as a start I found there was a Wikipedia page (I'd never heard of chakchirs)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_hussars

Hoping uhlans, cuirassiers and dragoons have something similar.

I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Last Hussar

The problem I have is the fact Russian Cavalry is 4 or 8 squadrons of each regiment, 400 or 800 men.

A single Cavalry base in Blucher is about 800. If I was painting just for Blucher I would be having stands of 6 horse, 3 in one uniform,  3 in another!
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Duke Speedy of Leighton

Done that for FOW, it's personal choice.
You may refer to me as: Your Grace, Duke Speedy of Leighton.
2016 Pendraken Painting Competion Participation Prize  (Lucky Dip Catagory) Winner

Last Hussar

If you've seen my post about cavalry in the 'Rules' board, you'll know I have modified how I am going to do the Russian cavalry, and my 'sod about with the rules for points'.

A standard game of Blucher is 300 points.
The ENTIRE First Western Army at Borodino is 301...

Left to do;

Cavalry
3 Cavalry divisions each of 2 units; 18 bases, 108 figures (and every base has a different uniform).
3 guns, 12 figures.

Guard Division
Guards; 8 bases, 128 figures (2 units).
Guard artillery; 3 bases - 3 guns, 12 figures.
Grenadiers, 4 bases, 54 figures
Cuirassiers, 3 bases, 18 figures, 1 gun + 4 figures

Artillery Reserve
10 bases/guns, 40 figures
2 limbers (to denote 'Horse' on 2 units).

Then it's the 2nd Western Army...


I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Duke Speedy of Leighton

Megalomaniac's anonymous called...
You may refer to me as: Your Grace, Duke Speedy of Leighton.
2016 Pendraken Painting Competion Participation Prize  (Lucky Dip Catagory) Winner

sunjester

But have you got the Royal Italian guard done for the French?

Last Hussar

Not yet. Just 1 unit needed, so two bases, skirmishers and a cannon. Will probably do 3, so I can use them for other rules.
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Last Hussar

Quote from: Duke Speedy of Leighton on 07 May 2024, 03:38:31 PMMegalomaniac's anonymous called...

Megalomaniac's anonymous? That seems a tautology!
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Ithoriel

Quote from: Last Hussar on 08 May 2024, 08:36:00 AMMegalomaniac's anonymous? That seems a tautology!

Megalomaniacs Unanimous, perhaps?
There are 100 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who can work from incomplete data

Last Hussar

Quote from: Duke Speedy of Leighton on 07 May 2024, 03:38:31 PMMegalomaniac's anonymous called...
Not sure why - like I say 1st Western is just enough to do a standard game.

2nd Western is only 240 points, and with Little Wooden Men is perfectly affordable - I probably have almost all of the French (need to do the Italians, as mentioned above).
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Last Hussar

I have a 'justifiable' uniform scheme for Reserve Cavalry divisions 1-3.

18 bases of men. 16 different uniforms...
I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry

Duke Speedy of Leighton

Could be one base and 18 uniforms...
You may refer to me as: Your Grace, Duke Speedy of Leighton.
2016 Pendraken Painting Competion Participation Prize  (Lucky Dip Catagory) Winner

Last Hussar

I have neither the time nor the crayons to explain why you are wrong.

"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

GNU PTerry