54,000 figures anyone?!

[petercooman]

I'd be surprised if you had.  I have never posted any pics of my games on the forum or anywhere else.  There are, nevertheless, hundreds of pictures posted by individuals of their games, and taken at shows, of terrain that is streets ahead of this.   A quick Google, or with the search engine of your choice, and you will see for yourself.

That still doesn't make it "the standard". The standard for me is cot-efective and easily storable and transportable terrain, and I'm guessing I'm not the only one.

There will always be others with more time/money/dedication to spend on these things. That does not put someone's efforts 'below standard". Just a different approach 

[fsn]

Am I theonly one who would get 54,000 figures on the table and then say ... "nah. I've gone off the idea"?

[petercooman]

Am I theonly one who would get 54,000 figures on the table and then say ... "nah. I've gone off the idea"?

No you are not.

[John Cook]

That still doesn't make it "the standard". The standard for me is cot-efective and easily storable and transportable terrain, and I'm guessing I'm not the only one.

There will always be others with more time/money/dedication to spend on these things. That does not put someone's efforts 'below standard". Just a different approach 

Then we disagree.

[petercooman]

Would appear so wouldn't it 

[paulr]

That still doesn't make it "the standard". The standard for me is cot-efective and easily storable and transportable terrain, and I'm guessing I'm not the only one.

There will always be others with more time/money/dedication to spend on these things. That does not put someone's efforts 'below standard". Just a different approach 

Agreed

Then we disagree.

Agreed