Fred’s 2025 Painting and Gaming Diary

[fred.]

As I had a sudden burst of activity in posting on last year's diary towards the end of the year, let's go for this agin. For the umpteenth year - I feel the need to go back and check how long this log has been going on. 

2024 ended with a lot of Eisenhower being played, had quite a bit of Legions Imperialis through out, and a fair bit of Warmaster XL at the start. 

The first two are likely to keep making appearances. 

Midguard will likely get a spin as a fantasy rule set. 

I finally gave into the AWI temptation right at the end of 2024 (in the spend £150 to save £1.20 a pack rationale!!!). So that will be a big chunk on painting effort. I have a few bits of armies to finish painting so they should definitely get done (WWI British, Epic Squats, Ogres, Lizardmen). Then there are lots of other armies sitting in pristine metal in drawers that ought to get some paint, but not sure which one. Off the top of my head there are, Ratmen, Orcs (so many Orcs), Barons War, Conquisadors and Meso-Americans, Late Medieval Polish, Landsneckts (who are part done), more Mongols, LoA, Renaissance, extra Afrika Korps infantry (who could actually be useful to get done) more late WWI British and Germans. 

Eek!

[fred.]

A bit of looking back indicates that these diaries have been going since 2012. Wow! 

I had an enjoyable re-read of 2022s games - and the intro for 2022 mentioned both Orc and Late Roman armies that had been in the stash since 2012   And I forgot the Late Romans in my list of armies above. What chance is there of them getting painted this year?

First game of the year (and first for a while with Xmas interrupting gaming) was another game of Eisenhower - the same western desert scenario as about a month ago, but with different players. 



The Germans are on the let, British on the right, objectives are the green squiggles. The British commander, has chosen to deploy his Infantry Division in the swamps - even though this isn't terrain that gives Infantry a combat advantage, and he has split his Veteran 7th Armoured division at the far end of the table with its Crusaders in the open desert, and its infantry in the mountains. 

Troops are deployed before the objectives are placed (though the broad area for the objectives is known) Attacker places one, then the defender, then the attacker the last one.



The German attack is making good ground in the centre, and on the far side the Germans out numbering the spread out British infantry 2 : 1 have gained the objective in the hills.



German attack continues, the British reinforcements (2nd NZ Div) have arrived to shore up the line. In Eisenhower objectives that are taken by the attacker, are then moved 1 box by the defender. Which keeps forcing the attacker forward. Around the central objective 7th Armoured's Crusaders are performing sterling defence vs Ariete. 



Change of camera angle, I had to take over the British at this point, as the British player had to pop home to deal with a family 'emergency' that turned out to be nothing much. 

I was attempting to consolidate my forces in the middle, but the Germans kept throwing in repeated attacks. The attackers get 4 stockpiles in a standard scenario (compared to 2 for the defender) and the best use for these is to be able to recover Exhausted units (yellow tokens) back to Worn. So whilst the British were getting a lot of German units to Exhausted, I didn't have enough troops to attack them again to remove them before they could recover in the night phase. Also as the defender you are trying to maintain the prepared status of units as this means your units fight first in a combat, hopefully downgrading the attackers. 

I say hopefully as in one combat I did take all the attackers to exhausted, so they needed 6s to hit, which they then promptly rolled 5 of!



The end of the game - end of day 5 I think - the Germans finally got ahead on VPs and where then able to call an end to the game (the attacker can choose to end the game after day 4). 

A closer game on points than the fighting shows - perhaps as the British took the first turn 3-0 and most others where 2-1 to the Germans so it took them some time to clawback the first turn disadvantage. 

Played out very differently to the first play of this scenario - which is no bad thing!

A couple of historical scenarios (Nijmegen and Bastogne) have been posted by Sam Mustafa so they might be up next to give my US Airborne a run out.

[hammurabi70]

Interesting AAR.

A closer game on points than the fighting shows - perhaps as the British took the first turn 3-0 and most others where 2-1 to the Germans so it took them some time to clawback the first turn disadvantage.

This we find a major problem with this ruleset; the attacker seldom makes effective progress for the first few days and that gives a huge disadvantage for the rest of the game.  We have concluded that the objectives and victory system needs a major overhaul but have yet to resolve what that should be.

[fred.]

Interesting- this is probably the first time we've spotted this. And I only spotted it when writing up. 

The momentum does go to the attacker over turns as they can replenish more units. 

I do wonder if not scoring on turn 1 might be sensible - but this is a game where the setup means you are right into the combat straight away.